Valencia University (2018): Meta-Analysis of 54 Studies

November 1, 2018

What parents need to know

Paper-based reading yields better comprehension than digital-based reading. The advantage of paper has actually increased over the years since 2000 – as screens get better, the gap gets wider.

Full Citation

Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23-38.

Publication Type

Meta-analysis published in Educational Research Review (also referenced earlier but expanded here with additional context)

What They Studied

Valencia University researchers conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of 54 studies examining reading comprehension differences between paper and digital media. The analysis investigated not just whether there was a difference, but whether that difference had changed over time as digital reading technology improved and people became more familiar with screens.

Key Findings

  • “Paper-based reading yields better comprehension outcomes than digital-based reading”
  • “The advantage of paper-based comprehension has increased over the years since 2000”
  • This finding is counterintuitive and particularly important: as screens have improved technologically and readers have become more experienced with digital reading, the paper advantage has grown rather than shrunk
  • The meta-analysis provides the most comprehensive statistical synthesis of reading comprehension research available
  • 54 studies represent thousands of participants across diverse contexts
  • The time trend is crucial – it refutes the argument that screen disadvantages will disappear as technology improves or as “digital natives” replace older readers
  • If anything, the data suggests the opposite: more sophisticated screens and more experienced screen readers still show larger comprehension gaps
  • The finding held true across different types of texts, different measures of comprehension, and different digital formats
  • This suggests the issue is not technological limitations but something fundamental about how we cognitively process text on screens versus paper

Disclaimer: We’ve created this overview to help busy parents quickly grasp the key findings. It should not be considered a substitute for reading the original study. For accuracy and complete context, please consult the source document.